Hey Dave, On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:51 +0100, Dave Love wrote: > Al Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> writes: > > >> I then built the RPM, and got the same failure as with the current > >> release. > > > > That is indeed interesting. My only guess is that perhaps a lingering > > old freeipmi.tar.gz src file was picked up during the rpm build? But > > then again, I gave you a new version number, so that's probably not > > it. > > Indeed. It was running a new version, apparently with new libraries. > > > Hmmmm. How are you building the rpm? > > I think I just did `rpmbuild -tb <tarball>'.
Hmmm. Should be fine ... > I'll try to figure out what's happening before too long. Is it > understandable that you should get static or dynamic binaries depending > on whether or not you build the rpms? It should be dynamic all the time w/ FreeIPMI. Thanks for looking into it. Al -- Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-users mailing list Freeipmi-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
