Yup, that does sound like a cut & paste error. I'll add an issue for me to fix.
Thanks, Al On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 13:08 -0400, Aleksey Yakovlev wrote: > A comment below in the "impi_monitoring.h" says: > > ... > /* > * ipmi_monitoring_sensor_iterator_next > * > * Advance iterator to the next set of sensors information > * > * Returns 0 on success, -1 on error > */ > int ipmi_monitoring_sensor_iterator_next (ipmi_monitoring_ctx_t c); > ... > > However I see different behavior - the function returns 1 if iterator > has > been advanced successfully, and it returns 0 in the end. > > (Version 1.6.1) > > Thank you, > ~AY > _______________________________________________ > Freeipmi-users mailing list > Freeipmi-users@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users -- Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-users mailing list Freeipmi-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
