Hello Dan and Chris,

the last test version has been published on the 2nd of September. We
have got bug reports, I have fixed the most of them until the middle of
September. But because Dan has a role of the project leader until the
final release of the 0.9.0 and Chris has a role of the project manager,
I do not produce the new version until you give me a sign.

Because I have fixed every reported issue I could fix and I do not see
any movements in the project during the last weeks, I ask for permission
to publish the next test version.

What do you think?

In the last part of my mail I write the status of issues raised by Dan
in his review from the 14th of September:

> FOLDING_MARK_COLOR. The color of the folding mark should match the 
> color of the edge, which it does not. Compare to version 0.8.0. 
> Versions: Beta13.
Fixed

> OPTION_OLD_ROUTING_OF_ROOT_EDGES. There should be a user option to 
> let the root edges be routed just like they were in 0.8.0. The new 
> routing, though looking good on maps with a small number of children,
>  looks poor on maps with a high number of children, as seen in the 
> documentation map of FreeMind. Versions: Beta13.

I could implement the requested change if Chris support it, because I 
have written the current implementation of the map layout components. 
But I still wait for Chris seconding or rejecting the request.

> FEEDBACK_ON_CONVERSION. When converting an old map from the 0.8.0 
> format into the 0.9.0 format, (a) user gets no option to reject the 
> conversion, and (b) there is no progress bar, which would be rather 
> valuable, as the process of conversion takes long on large maps 
> having around 10 MB. Versions: Beta13.

As we have agreed that I do not modify the parts programmed by Chris in
order to reduce the probability of introducing new bugs, I may not
implement this request.

Further I do not understand what should happen if the user rejects the
conversion, and if the question should be asked on opening or on the
first save.

Finally I have never seen that the conversion would take too much time,
so that I do not see the need of the additional progress bar.

> SCROLL_WHEEL_IN_BROWSE_MODE. In browse mode, scroll wheel does not 
> work. Versions: Beta13. SCROLL_WHEEL_IN_FILE_MODE. In file mode, 
> scroll wheel does not work. Versions: Beta13.
> 
> SCROLL_WHEEL_IMPROVEMENT. Changing the two constants for scroll wheel
>  to the values of 1 and 80 makes the scroll wheel experience 
> pleasant, similar to the one in Firefox.
> 
> OPTION_INVISIBILITY_OF_NOTE_WINDOW. There should be a user option to 
> hide the note window completely, matching the look of 0.8.0. 
> Versions: Beta13.
> 
> OPTION_NO_TAB. There should be an option not to use tabs for document
>  browsing, so that the look is as minimalistic as in 0.8.0. Tabs can 
> be enabled by default though. Versions: Beta13.

As we have agreed that I do not modify the parts programmed by Chris in
order to reduce the probability of introducing new bugs, I may not
implement this request.

Regards,
Dimitry

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer

Reply via email to