Hi, Dan Polansky said: > I think it unrealistic to want to implement all or even most of the > feature > requests, > unless some developer wants to serve the user community instead of > implementing > the features most interesting to him or her. I personally was always > implementing > my favorite features, in the way that I preferred, and only some of the > obvious, > low-effort features requested by others. Some of the requests are pretty > outlandish > anyway. It sounds to me like you're suggesting to remove the Enhancement Requests tracker? Anyway, it's not about implementing everything, if requests are too outlandish, they can be closed with a polite explanation. I also think that many of the requested features have been implemented, they've just not been closed. And, last, with more active developers, we would cover a broader band of interests, perhaps so much that we cover 80% of the enhancement requests. Would be already a great improvement...
Cheers, Eric -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
