Hello Eric,
I am unsure whether you understood what I meant when speaking of
relationships in contrast to substance. I only meant that my mail was not
addressing the merit of the thing but rather the relationships in the
project. I meant that I did not discuss the version numbering scheme; I was
discussing the way in which you have addressed your proposal to the team. I
had found your way insolent.
I have been told that relationships should be separated from the technical
topic, but not ignored. I have been told that relationships should be
treated too.
When I have received your initial email, I felt strange. I did not
understand it, I have seen no examples, and it seemed overly unprofessional,
difficult to read. Also, it said that unless I protest, I am bound to
something. I felt need to make this a topic of itself. I felt need to
clarify that there are certain roles and relationships between people and
that certain styles of communication are inappropriate.
So again, it is inappropriate that you assume passive approval. I completely
disagree with this. Whenenever you do it again, I declare with this email
ahead that I disagreee with any of your suggestions formulated in this way.
Best regards,
Dan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Freemind-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
