On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 03:01:33 +0600, Dimitry Polivaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> <node TEXT="This is a <b>HTML</b> node"> </node> > >> I understand these decisions have been made years ago, and it is >> probably too hard to change now, but I wanted to know the reasons >> behind such choices. > > I think that you example is just no valid HTML. So we have introduced a > new child node instead of an attribute where valid XHTML is saved. We > could omit tags <html> and <body>, but the original idea has been that > there could be other kinds of rich context there. > Hmm I could guess that, but I was thinking of maintaining some kind of compatibility with older versions wherever possible - this seemed like one such point. Reasamp ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
