Jeffrey B. Siegal wrote:
> Ramon van Handel wrote:
> > What do you suggest ? clone() and then handle Xlib updates in a different
> > thread ?
>
> That should work. I hope you're not suggesting calling clone from
> withing the signal handler though. Create the thread first, have it go
> to sleep, have the signal handler wake it up, let it do its work, and
> then go back to sleep.
That's what I meant.
> Or move all the processing into one thread using some sort of select
> model. Can be ugly, but this is of course the classic Unix
> (pre-threads) approach.
Hmm... I prefer to keep it clean ;)
-- Ramon