Ulrich Weigand wrote:

> Ramon van Handel wrote:
>
> > Okay it's fixed.  Attached is a new patch (replaces previous one).
>
> Well, it still isn't quite correct, the treatment of the 'loc' array
> is of course wrong now if a run with count > 1 is split ...

Hm.. you're right.  I have a few ideas on how to fix this,
but I don't have time to code right now (I'll fix it ASAP).

-- Ramon


Reply via email to