>I'd prefer not to have the assumption DS == ES == FS == GS
>hardcoded into the kernel :-/ Please treat all segment
>registers separately.
Ok.
>Not really. 'cs' points to some descriptor that has just been regenerated
>from the guest GDT; there's no point in modifying it ...
Ok.
>No! If the guest ljmp's to a real data segment, it *should* get a GPF ;-)
>You should add a check here (like the one in emulate_call).
>
>If it really is a code segment, you want to to call codeseg_activate on
>the new CS (and deactivate the old CS) ...
Ok.
Good to have an attentive CVS man :)
jens
fiascoII.diff
