Ulrich Weigand wrote: > (While we're at it, we might also fix the code to actually > respect guest segment registers ;-/ Then again, maybe that's > not a priority for now ...) Also a good idea. I'm keeping both paging-level and segmentation level checks in mind while coding. We need this framework so we don't have to rewrite. -Kevin
- progress... Kevin P. Lawton
- Re: progress... Ulrich Weigand
- Re: progress... Kevin P. Lawton
- Kevin P. Lawton
