Ulrich Weigand wrote:

> (While we're at it, we might also fix the code to actually
> respect guest segment registers ;-/  Then again, maybe that's
> not a priority for now ...)

Also a good idea.  I'm keeping both paging-level and
segmentation level checks in mind while coding.  We
need this framework so we don't have to rewrite.

-Kevin

Reply via email to