Sid Karnik wrote:
>
> does that imply that we will need to use a different code base for the win32
> port? or can we get by by simply a #ifdef WIN32 thingie.
>
> we would certainly get into trouble with any assembly stuff, since both vc++
> as well as masm use 'intel' style instructions.
>
> i guess the only way to find out if mingw32 does the job is to actually try
> and compile a driver and see if it works ok on an nt box.
There should only be a reasonably small amount of assembly code
needed. For the small snippets, perhaps we could use macros.
For whole functions in assembly, maybe some #ifdefs.
Anyways, for now, gcc/asm is fine. Function is more
important than portability currently.
-Kevin
