>>>>> "SH" == Steven Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm just a little skeptical that these guys could get a working
>> product up without -any- Fred code in it fast enough to make
>> these press statements. If it -did- have Fred code in it, I
>> believe that they'd have to put it under GPL -- since Fred is
>> GPL and not LGPL.
SH> There is *no way* they implemented it from scratch.
Yeah, that's what I figured.
BTW, the mention of the fact that the Perl, Python and C versions are
behind Fred was *not* a knock on those projects. It was supposed to
point out that a) implementing the Freenet protocol is HARD and b)
there's only one implementation that actually works right now, and
it's GPL'd.
I think all the others are GPL'd, too, so that may be a moot pt.
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/\____/\ Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
\ / Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
| (X \x)
( ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
\ <vvv> If it's not crazy, don't say it." - Ben Franklin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
