>From Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> So in the future, we're also even. So it comes down to which one is better
>> design, and Scott wins. I've got a bit of hacking to do. First, I sleep.
>
>I have a bit of an issue with the format:
>freenet:MSK@[subspace pubkey]/[mapkey]/[document name]
>
>While putting the subspace pubkey in the MSK is an option, it's not
>totally necessary and would be more compact without it. You could instead
>put the pubkey in the mapfile.
>
>My other nitpick that this syntax requires that the mapkey can't have a
>/. I'd prefer that the document name couldn't have a //.
>
>Which would leave us with freenet:MSK@mapkey//documentname, which is what
>I think you were thinking about anyway, but I thought I'd be explicit
>since Scott's proposed syntax differed from this syntax.
>
I don't understand how you can get away without the subspace pubkey... how do
you find the mapkey?
--
Benjamin Coates
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
