>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Is the only possible anonymity threat something that causes the browser to >make a request over a non-freenet protocol like http? I mean, can we say >JavaScript is OK so long as it doesn't trick the browser into making >a non-freenet request? > >If so, you can easily protect yourself just by configuring your browser >to use a non-existent proxy for any non-freenet protocol, or use a firewall, >or whatever.. right? > Well, aside from utterly breaking HTTP, that would probably work. I'm not entirely sure how reliably you can ensure that your browser never tries to make non-proxy connections, though. -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detect... Gianni Johansson
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detect... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security de... Dev Random
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector check... Dev Random
- RE: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector check... news
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector c... Dale Babiy
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detect... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security de... Dale Babiy
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security de... Scott Gregory Miller
- RE: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Duncan Irvine
- Re: [Freenet-dev] freenet:// Philipp Hug