On Sun, Dec 31, 2000, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:02:31AM -0800, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> > Here's my idea for keyword searches. I volunteer to implement it.
>
> That's very nice of you, and please don't be put off - but you
> utterly misunderstand much of Freenet.
>
> > Each node keeps an index of the ksk's it has in it's data store.
When
it =
> > receives a Request.Search
>
> KSKs are binary by the time they hit a node.
Thanks for being patient with me. I'm learning quick. I must have
missed that part in the documentation. I thought KSK's were
retrieved as is and the resulting document was a pointer to a CHK.
It definately makes more sense from a deniablity standpoint to
use a dropthrough encryption algorithm on the KSK first.
As far as being a broadcast, I understand that's bad, but I
figured with caching and low hops to live, it would be no worse
than any other data request.
l8r
Aaron
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
