Adrian Midgley wrote:
>
> From: Tim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >This version has the codes removed so that it will be installable
> >on lower end machines.
>
> How silly an idea would it be to separate the code-server from the
> rest?
Not silly. But not needed. The only reason that it had to be
seperated was because (I assume) an entire folder is pulled into
memory while it is being imported.
> One then goes to having one code-server module in a building.
> And thence to that being a mirror or cache of the central code-server
> for the health care system.
> Tomorrow, the world.
You're not far off. For larger (and larger, and larger....)
installations. ZEO takes care of it. Basically,
as long as you continue to through hardware at it, your site can
continue to grow.
See the ZEO Fact Sheet:
http://www.zope.org/Products/ZEO/ZEOFactSheet
>
> It might be one way of having easily changeable code families
> according to where one was, fashion, politics and so on.
This isn't finished yet, but I expect to be able to select chosen
code set(s) at an installation level. So if you want ICD9, ICD10
& LOINC or one of them it will all work transparently.
Sorry if this isn't coherent. I'm am very rushed. Will take the
time to go over this later. Feel free to donate any insights. <g>
-- Tim Cook --
Office: (901) 884-4126 8am-5pm CST
Free Practice Management,Inc. | http://FreePM.org
Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom.
_______________________________________________
Freepm-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freepm-discuss
