Jo Dillon wrote:
>
> Ok, well you've probably all seen the news about Qt going open-source
> now. Do we have agreement that we should cease development on Harmony
> as it now stands? Anyone who thinks we should continue, speak now;
> if we do decide to kill Harmony then I can start doing some coding
> with Qt at work :)
>
Absolutely not! I'm not a coder in Harmony. Just a very interested user
of KDE/QT, but as i understand it, the QPL still does not allow the
development of commercial apps with QT Free Edition. Many may not like
commercial apps, but everyone agrees that if Linux is to be successful
in the desktop we have to be attractive to commercial apps. GTK doesn't
have this problem because it is LGPL. All this license change does is
permit you to supply patches to Qt. My main gripe with the license of Qt
was and is the fact i pointed out above.
Greets and continue the good work :)
--
_____________________________________________________________ __ _
/
/____________ ______________________________________________ __ _
\___/ / / / / / / Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ /___/ / / / --- / / / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/___ / / / / __/ /
/ / / / / / / / / / /
/_______/___/_______/___/___/__/___/__/________________________ __ _
\_______\___\_______\___\___\_________\________________________ __ _
-=#( LINUX, The OS For People With An IQ Higher Than 95! )#=-
