Sorry about the previous message I sent. Qt is possibly not Free Software yet. One key characteristic of Free Software is to allow code reuse, and QPL does not allow reuse of Qt's code (i.e, you cannot take a part of Qt and put it into another program). QPL is taking advantage of a bug in the Open source definition. It possibly is not truly in the spirit of Open Source. Abandoning Harmony may not be the best thing for the Free Software community. a free software user
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Andy Tai
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Quang Ngo
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Olivier Galibert
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Stephan Kulow
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Eirik Eng
- [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Adam J. Richter
- Re: [freeqt] Qt not truly Free Software yet... Adam J. Richter
