> Oh please, there should be at least one or two programmers from the > gnome camp who would be willing to work on a common solution, which > still keeps Koffice (which has been around since long time) alive. I'm not from the 'gnome camp', but nevertheless I'd like to see KOM/OpenParts usable from any framework. Unfortunately, the documentation is rather poor and the line between the 'open' part and the Qt specific part not really well drawn. Bernd.
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Greg S. Hayes
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Andy Tai
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Mosfet
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Stephan Kulow
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Mosfet
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Stephan Kulow
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Mosfet
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Stefan Westerfeld
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Bernd Gehrmann
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Greg S. Hayes
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Greg S. Hayes
- [freeqt] Future of Gnome, was Re: Future of Harmony Christof Petig
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Mosfet
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Carl Thompson
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Mosfet
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Carl Thompson
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Mosfet
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony Carl Thompson
- Re: [freeqt] Future of Harmony cet