At 10:21 AM 7/27/2001 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>At 11:09 26/07/01 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Is there a proxy in between? There are proxies that do not implement
> >> >that radius protocol correctly, they just send the accounting packets
> >> >through once and don't retry if they don't get an ack back.
> >>
> >> Yes, there is a proxy in between. I believe it runs "Enhanced Merit AAA
> >> Radius".
> >
> > The Merit server does not implement the RADIUS protocol correctly.
> >
> > Alan DeKok.
>
><sigh>
>
>Why doesn't that surprise me..... :)
>
>Can you be more specific ?
Specifically they ignore the RFC and mangle the Proxy-State for their
own purposes among others.
We used Merit Enhanced once upon a time, moved quickly to a customized
version based on the Livingston 2.1 code-base, and are now moving towards
a implementation based on Freeradius.
my 2 cents,
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ Chris Parker - Manager, Development Engineering
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless! \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| @ @ | \ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\------------------------------------------------------
\ Without C we would have 'obol', 'basi', and 'pasal'
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
