"John Padula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've also searched the mailing lists for the last 6 months and have seen
> repeated postings that talk about the infamous "+" option and how it
> allows incrementing IP addresses to be assigned. It seems, though,=20
> that most of the advice on how to get this going had to do with passing
> back some pool name id to the NAS and let *it* manage the IP addresses.
Yes, that is the *definitive* solution.
> It didn't seem to complicated, so I gave it a try, but my users
> keeps getting assigned the same IP address..?! Now, I should
> qualify that and say that my "users" are really via radtest, but I
> don't think that should matter.
No, it shouldn't. I'm seeing the same thing here.
> So, since I don't see any bug on the recent bug list that describes
> a problem with dynamic IP addresses, I have to ask: is it broken
> and/or has it ever worked??
It's broken, it used to work.
And it's fixed. :) See the latest CVS commit, or grab the CVS
snapshot from tonight.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
