i probably should have mentioned that these were generated on a linux box, so you probably need to use vi or some editor that honors unix newlines.. if it would help, I can send a second set later today that are dos-ified .. and probably put in the patch chris suggested..
-j ----- Original Message ----- From: "jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:03 PM Subject: Re: radclient question > svr4 is the cistron and radius2 is a freeradius. I generated these using > radtest. > the payloads look pretty identical to my untrained eye. > > -j > > > > At 04:17 PM 10/30/2001 -0600, jason wrote: > > >But the packets are not *exactly* identical, though the part i truncated > was > > >identical. The portion I attatched to my last mailing had differences, > > >which due to my limited knowledge of how the radius packet is formatted, > I > > >am unable to understand. > > > > there is a 'vector' that is calculated on per-client basis. > > > > >I'm perfectly willing to believe that is in fact the hiperarc's that are > at > > >fault somehow, but I need some information of what is going on. Whether > the > > >fault be with the hyperarc or the radius server. > > > > Try a recent version of tcpdump that will display the attributes that are > > being sent. I don't read radius attributes in hex yet ( though I'm closer > > than I'd like ). > > > > -Chris > > > > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
