In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Note that the current default behaviour ( to strip the tags ) works very >well with cisco and Lucent gear that does suppport the RFC, so if you >change the dictionary file to violate the RFC, you're on your own. I >would complain bloody murder to whomever you are receiving the non-RFC >standard tunnel packets from to fix their broken radius implementation.
Right, this is perhaps a bit offtopic, but does anyone know how Livingston nee Lucent Portmaster 3's behave ? They do support the tunnel attributes with ComOS 3.9 but I don't think that the latest Livingston radius server (2.1) didn't have support for tagged attrs .. Mike. -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
