Nick Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like gdbm is not very well maintained. Here is what I found while > searching for a 1.8 debian package...
OK... > gdbm (1.7.3-27) unstable; urgency=low > > * No 1.8 yet because a) the soname has changed, making packaging it less > trivial, b) the upstream changes are not hugely important and c) 1.8 > appears after 5 years of upstream inactivity and has since been > followed by another 18 months of upstream inactivity despite some > trivial and annoying build bugs in 1.8 which must hit almost everyone > who tries to build it from source. And people wonder why I don't like a lot of the GNU packages. The FSF is rabid about GNU software, and GPL'd software in general. Yet they would rather ship garbage for *years* than accept patches from people who aren't buddy-buddy with RMS. <sigh> OK, the CVS snapshot from tonight should have 'configure' fixed for the counter module. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
