Ted Frohling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I was not particularly clear on which security method I needed. It > is indeed SSL.
Using TLS isn't terribly different (from a security point of view) than SSL. In fact, TLS (from what I recall) is the successor to SSL. > I started digging into the code and came to the same conclusion > that right now it's not ready to do this. We're weighing the cost of development > and the cost of purchasing a commercial radius server that has the capability > built in. <g> I've seen commercial servers go from $5k to $50k. And you don't get source, or quick turn-around time for bug fixes. > Right now we are evaluating the Steel-Belted Radius Server. If we > decide to start hacking, we will certainly give those patches back to the > freeradius project. Sounds good to me. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
