Randy Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that you've shortened the field size for all of the attribute > values fields to 64 or 54 characters. Any reason not to keep them at 253?
They should be 253. I've just fixed that. > I don't think I understand keys well enough to predict which would have the > best performance, and don't have high enough load yet to properly test them > directly. And I don't know enough about SQL to comment. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
