[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:36:08PM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote: > > On a side note, perhaps I should release the socket only when the access of > > the 'row' pointer is done? Or perhaps the api should be altered (again) to > > pass a pointer array into fetch_row so that the socket can be released without > > the potential for over-writing prior results? > This question was discussed at > http://www.mail-archive.com/freeradius-users@lists.cistron.nl/msg07312.html
I'll add: http://www.freeradius.org/cvs-log/2002-07-26.08:00:02.html Look for the word 'dendy' Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
