On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:13:38 -0400 "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That was not the exact error message. I am sorry, I will post the
> > correct one when I have a spare server built and I can regenerate the
> > problem. One OS was SuSE 8.0 on ReiserFS (on LVM, on RAID) and the
> > other was RedHat 7.2 on Ext2. (Both are running current recommended
> > kernels from the vendors.)
>
> Hmm... they should be able to handle files larger than 2G.
>
> > OK. I wasn't aware there was such a thing as failover for the detail
> > module. I will check into this.
>
> Failover exists for ALL modules. See 'doc/configurable_failover'
OK. I will definately play with this tomorrow. Thanks
> > > Sure. Grab the latest CVS snapshot from tonight (not last night).
> > > Edit the name of the detail file to be something like:
> > >
> > > detailfile = ${radacctdir}/%{Client-IP-Address}/detail-%D:%H
> >
> > Yes. This is how I am doing it by day. I will not change it to hourly.
>
> Then you can use 'detail-%D' in the version you have, so there's no
> need to download a snapshot.
Thanks. That was supposed to be "now", instead of "not".. Typo...
> > Just out of interest, I posted to the devel mailing list re a spec file
> > for SuSE with no answer. I now have several pieces of misc code (spec
> > files, perl parsers, sql schemas, sql.conf) which would probably be
> > useful to others. Should I post them to devel? Is anyone interested in
> > having them?
>
> Sure. Patches are integrated as people have time...
ok
--
Peter Nixon
msg09609/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
