Malcolm Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fair enough - except I am trying to store an xlat there. The xlat > string (fmt) is longer than 254 octets BUT the results of the xlat are > not! > > I don't know what a quick fix is here. Perhaps the size of strvalue > could be bigger - you just check that it is < 254 before you place it on > the wire.
The string contents should ideally be allocated as memory seperate from the VALUE_PAIR data structure. That would allow it to grow as needed. As always, patches are welcome. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
