Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > both are right, but they have there place (assuming i'm reading the docs > right, and assuming my other assumtions about it are correct) > > := in the replies and == in the checks unless your doing something that the > check needs to be something else. > > i agree, i can't see using anything other then := in the replies.
See 'doc/rlm_sql', and 'man 5 users' for more detailed information. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
