In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >20-Dec-02 at 13:41, Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : >> http://lists.cistron.nl/archives/freeradius-devel/2002/10/msg00107.html > >Thanks. Is there a difference in score between average regular posts and >those spams which slip through? Could the threshold be lowered?
The cutoff score is the default, 5. I'm not sure about what exactly gets rejected - the mail isn't actually filtered through spamassassin, the script just calls 'spamc -c' to check if it is spam. If so it is simply thrown away. Perhaps I should fix that so that you can read the score in the headers of spam that slips through. Need to find /time/ for that though, and I aften say I don't have enough of it, and now my collegue has just told us he'll be trying his luck somewhere else, so I'm not going to get any more time soon ... Mike. -- They all laughed when I said I wanted to build a joke-telling machine. Well, I showed them! Nobody's laughing *now*! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
