Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:47:28PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > >[...stuff on how complex it is to bind to >1 interface deleted] > > Why not just run two instances of radiusd - one on each address? They can > point to the same auth system - just the logfiles have to be different...
I can understand people wanting the *same* radius server to listen on 2 interfaces, and respond correctly from those interfaces. Running one server which listens on 2 interfaces is a reasonable solution. If that's implemented, then I'll bet the next request will be for the ability to run one server, which does different things, based on which interface received the request. The response to that will be NO. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
