Thomas Jalsovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sent many times the SAME feature to the list, but project > leaders (or leader, I can't remember) said, we should make a general > architecture for this type of hacks and not do with rlm_preprocess.
That's true, but it looks like the general architecture is a long way away. > So it is not in the CVS (but It should from a long time...). I've added it to my list of "patches to add". Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
