Kostas Kalevras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > checkrad is one huge piece of software which i don't think will ever be moved > inside the server. It uses SNMP only for specific nas types (cisco for example) > and other methods (like telnet) for other nas types.
Yeah, but moving the SNMP queries into the server core would at least be a step forwards. Hmm... there's also the issue that the Simultaneous-Use code for the various modules each calls rad_check_ts(), which probably isn't a good idea. > I would prefer just using perl xlat to call it directly from the server thus > avoiding the perl interpreter overhead. That's preferred over forking checkrad. > The overhead isn't that large in any case since checkrad is only called in > double login cases. True. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
