I don't want to add another proxying principle as the current one fullfill my requirement, but I don't see why you should drop packet not containing a User-Name field. From my point of view it should fall in the NULL , or the DEFAULT case (same way as packet not containing a realm) can you explain me a little bit more why you think that those packet should be drop.
Thanks,
Arnaud G
but there is a practical issue. i think that freeradius proxying is currently largely based on the User-Name (all the configuration for proxying and next server is based on realms which are suffixes or prefixes of the User-Name). so, it is very logical for me to drop the packet if you don't know where to proxy it to because otherwise FR does not know what to do about it.
if you want to add another proxying principle, you should probably add code and extend the config file formats. what do you want to base proxying decisions on?
perhaps Alan should comment on it.
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
