I may try running the two on the same server if you think there would be a significant performance improvement. I notice both openldap and freeradius require as much RAM as they can get. They each use the lion's share of 512MB on 1Gh machine. No memory concerns about bundling them on the same server? Also, would you let me know when a fix for the ldap caching problem is in and where I can get it so I can load the latest version on openldap on the radius server?
Thanks, Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kostas Kalevras Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: openldap-2.1.16 and freeradius not compatable(was rlm_ldap issues) On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Mike Denka wrote: > Thanks for checking that out and for taking care of it. Will this pose > a performance problem for ldap authentication using the new openldap > libraries? No. The caching code was used only for the regular profiles anyway. And it never worked very nice. You are better off using an ldap server on localhost or unix sockets (ldapi://) if you need extra performance. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
