> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Friday, 4 April 2003 12:59 AM
> "Paul Hampson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Umm, rlm_ippool is marked as really buggy in 0.8.1, but > > it doesn't seem to have changed significantly in last night's > > snapshot (apart from adding the netmask attribute insertion) > "really buggy"? Apologies... It actually says "Highly experimental" in the entry in experimental.conf. I mis-remembered. :-) > > What exactly is wrong with it? It looks fine on a first > > glance, but I'm sure there are non-obvious problems. > I don't know. A lot of people have been using it > with some measure > of success. Sounds good to me. :-) Another question... Is there a target set of release goals for 0.9? I'd like to see freeradius re-enter Debian, and I'm curious to know how you're viewing it's progress at the moment. -- ========================================================= Paul "TBBle" Hampson Network Architect, Bandwidth Unlimited Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] --Nick Moffitt A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? --------------------------------------------------------- Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul "TBBle" Hampson ========================================================= - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
