On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:52:45AM -0500, Chris Parker wrote: > At 07:45 PM 6/3/2003 +0400, Alexander M. Pravking wrote: > It's not a dupe because it is different, that's the point. It is not > the same set of a/v pairs that was originally sent. I don't see anything > violating the RFC here.
Hmm... Maybe I'm wrong here, assuming that NAS should re-send packet with the same id. But then what the "duplicate" requests for? And in which case should we expect 'em? > >As I said, the server processed the first request too long - more than > >5 seconds. It happens sometimes, and I don't think it's too bad. > > Then increase the retry timeout on the cisco so it waits longer for a > response. Yes, but what if request will be processed more longer? > Alternatively, fix your radius server so it doesn't take 5 > *seconds* to process a request. :) I can do nothing here - it's proxied to remote server. -- Fduch M. Pravking - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
