On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:28:52PM +0200, Oliver Graf wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:21:13PM +0100, Graeme Hinchliffe wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:16:42 +0200
> > "Jonathan Ruano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi, Graeme:
> > > 
> > > Just a brainstrom (probably stupid) idea.. On what arch are you trying 
> > > freeradius? 17152 is 0x4300.. Just wondered if radius meant 0x0043 instead.
> > 
> > Linux i386 based.
> > 
> > and the test packets are coming from the same machine.. ... shirley endianness 
> > isn't the problem?
> 
> freeradius gives the same error for both paket length and radius
> length field errors. perhaps your radius client (I guess it's not the
> freeradius client?) builds mysterious pakets?

uh, I'm lying. it says length > and that means the length field of the
radius client.

so we now know it's the clients fault.

Oliver.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to