> From: Gustavo Lozano
> Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM

> So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already?

Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since
it doesn't do ML-PPP, and I haven't tested it due to my
development/testing machine's hard disk biting the dust.

> The problem with the current module seems very populated and as a matter
> of fact It is very persistent.

Yes. I think the problem is also inherent to the design of the
current module, and can't be easily worked around without
rewriting it to use a different DB layout. Currently, we have to
change the key of the IP pool list entries to record where they
are. It just seems _bad_.

If you're interested in the patch, I could post it as it is, and
would appreciate the testing.

There's also a patch posted by Johnathan (last name escapes me)
a while ago, but it doesn't apply to current CVS. :-( Based on
my design though, so it ought to be pretty much the same.

--
=========================================================
Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
        -- Cambridge University Math Department
---------------------------------------------------------
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul "TBBle" Hampson
=========================================================


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to