Dave Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This leads me to a quick question about where we are for EAP and where > we're going. I still have an item on my Todo list to fix rlm_eap and > the submodules to use RLM return codes, so, for example, an EAP subtype > could return RLM_HANDLED to indicate an incoming packet should just be > dropped. Is that one of the changes in the CVS?
Not yet. I plan on doing this over the next week or so. > If not, I'm still not sure when I'll get to it, but we need that to > meet the EAP-SIM spec. We're running with 0.8.1 now, but if I need > to make this change, I assume I should do it against 0.9.0? Against the CVS head. The 0.9.0 release should ONLY have critical bug fixes. > If the CVS has already changed, maybe I should wait till the next > release? I prefer to do my work on top of a released version, since > it will need to go to our customers. You can probably wait. I'd like to push 1.0 out as soon as possible. I see it mainly as a "code cleanup" release, with only a few new features. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
