Regards, Dave
Alan DeKok wrote:
Dave Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This leads me to a quick question about where we are for EAP and where we're going. I still have an item on my Todo list to fix rlm_eap and the submodules to use RLM return codes, so, for example, an EAP subtype could return RLM_HANDLED to indicate an incoming packet should just be dropped. Is that one of the changes in the CVS?
Not yet. I plan on doing this over the next week or so.
If not, I'm still not sure when I'll get to it, but we need that to
meet the EAP-SIM spec. We're running with 0.8.1 now, but if I need
to make this change, I assume I should do it against 0.9.0?
Against the CVS head. The 0.9.0 release should ONLY have critical bug fixes.
If the CVS has already changed, maybe I should wait till the next release? I prefer to do my work on top of a released version, since it will need to go to our customers.
You can probably wait. I'd like to push 1.0 out as soon as possible. I see it mainly as a "code cleanup" release, with only a few new features.
Alan DeKok.
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
