> From: Mohsen Chirara
> Sent: Monday, 1 September 2003 7:08 PM

> After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the
> entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
> addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1
> 
> What next ?

If that's with iptool -v, then we're in trouble, the fix didn't
solve it.

iptool -v shows every entry, active or not.

Oh, I forgot to say. You probably needed to recreate your
db files for rlm_ippool when you upgraded to CVS's rlm_ippool, or
otherwise confirm that the situation hasn't gotten worse since
you installed the CVS rlm_ippool.

In fact, I've just had a look at my own server (which has been
running the same fix from CVS for a while now) and my 230-odd
pool has been depleted to 26, of which only 15 have been used.
I had to repair mine last on July 26th, and its not a busy
server.

However, that's not decisive as the fix was only comitted on
the 28th, and I dunno how long I held off on installing it on
my production server.

I'll repair mine, and then see if I suffer further.

--
=========================================================
Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
        -- Cambridge University Math Department
---------------------------------------------------------
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul "TBBle" Hampson
=========================================================


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to