On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:26:07PM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is always the possibility to add a mutex locking fallback
> > version to libradius... perhaps I'll write one this weekend.
> 
>   That would be the simplest thing to do.

It seems it was too simple to get into my attention yesterday. And
today I did pave a path in my garden and managed to hit my thumbs
with a rubber hammer about three times. I think should better go
back to keyboard...

> > Any objections to such a thread-safe helper for systems without
> > reentrant calls from the core team?
> 
>   Nope.  I just wish that people had designed decent API's in the
> first place.  Functions returning (or using) static storage are
> ridiculous.  e.g. strtok(), gethostbyname(), etc.

In punch-card times parallel punching was not so common, it seems.

Oliver.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to