Greg G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does, but not what you'd hoped. It looks like I'm going to wind
> up using GNU Radius, because it *doesn't* exit when it encounters
> something it doesn't understand in the user file. It discards the entry
> for the invalid user.
Meaning that the server doesn't behave as intended, and it's
probably difficult for the administrator to figure that out. So
you're left with a server which isn't doing what you want...
> It doesn't seg fault if I make an acct request.
<shrug> You're probably running Solaris. That will get fixed in a
future release.
> And I don't have to fight with someone whose idea of gathering up new
> coders is "Fix it" without any help or guidance whatsoever.
No... I told you what my opinion was, and why. You didn't
understand me, or didn't care enough to listen to me. Your response
was a blind repetition of "YOU fix it!"
My response was then simply an echoing of your complaint:
No, YOU fix it.
I find it instructive that your own words directed at you cause huge
amounts of anger and hostility.
> So my asking for a feature is a baseless complaint? Riiiight.
Not listening to the response makes it baseless.
But why am I wasting my time? You've already made it clear that you
can't read the documentation, the README, or my replies on this list.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
