On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:12:31AM -0600, Nick Davis wrote: > On Thursday 20 November 2003 20:07, Paul Hampson wrote: > > As a bonus, the rlm_ippool pod2man call got fixed for perl < 5.6, and > > rlm_eap has been silenced in the case where it is called upon a non-EAP > > packet. > > > > There are pacakges for Debian at > > http://www.tbble.com/freeradius/ > > They're numbered 0.9.2-4 since (a) I'm moving and don't have time to > > muck with the new source archive; and (b) we're >< this close to getting > > into Debian/unstable so I don't want to muck with things too much until > > that's done. > > > > Just to reiterate, the 0.9.2-4 packages at http://www.tbble.com/freeradius/ > > are the same as the 0.9.3 tarball above, but with major Debian packaging > > improvements (biiiig thanks to Steve Langasek for his guidance here) which > > will hopefully go into 1.0.0 and 0.9.4's tarballs.
> Paul, > I see that these deb packages have the same dependency issues we discussed in > September with libiodbc2 and libltdl3. The Depends says: > freeradius: Depends: libiodbc2 (>= 3.51.1-3) but 3.51.1-1 is installed > Depends: libltdl3 (>= 1.5-3) but 1.5-2 is installed > freeradius-mysql: Depends: zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1) but 1:1.1.4-16 is installed To be honest, I don't remember discussing this in September, but my mail archives are currently in transit, so I can't check what I said. According to my local Debian mirror, (mirror.aarnet.edu.au), the current libiodbc2 in sid (/unstable) is 3.51.1-3, the current libltdl3 is 1.5-7, and the current zlib1g is 1:1.2.1-1 > I am running Sarge, and I tried to search through unstable. Where do those > versions of those libraries come from? Several of the debian web servers have > been compromised and are down for inspection, so I am not able to search for > the necessary versions of these libraries. Ah, that's the problem, testing's not up to date on these libraries. Since we're going for Debian archive acceptance, they have to be built against unstable. I may have previously built against testing, but I don't think I put those binaries anywhere, as they were built on a powerpc machine. On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Nick Davis wrote: > All, > I posted new versions of my slimed down debian packages: > http://mrtizmo.com/freeradius/index.html > > The big thing I did was to remove the need for iodbc, since it has a lot of > nasty dependencies. Apart from libc6, what other dependancies are you seeing from libiodbc2? (My unstable build machine is currently also in transit, so I can't check that myself. Last time I tried to get iodbc broken out into its own package, the lack of interesting dependancies was the deciding factor. I do intend to readdress this issue once we're in the Debian archive) -- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, from an alternate email client. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
