Nuno Morgadinho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'am doing a non-fundamentalist study about Freeradius versus Radiator > (http://www.open.com.au/radiator/), costs not-involved, to see what to > use at work. > > I looking for other studys, experiences, papers, opinions, etc.. to > cross notes on advantages and disadvantages of each.
There isn't much publicly available. It really depends on what you want out of a server. FreeRADIUS is *much* faster than RADIATOR, and will scale much better in high-load situations. Radiator (being written in Perl) is probably easier for the average person to customize. But FreeRADIUS is designed so that 99% of what people do is in the default config, and Just Works. > In terms of funcionalities, we want to have PEAP and MS-CHAPv2 support. 1.0.0 has this, and is interoperable with many clients. > A administration tool, like dialup_admin is greatly appreciated since in > the end, it will be a large system. That will administer users, but you'll still have to edit the servers other configuration files by hand. FreeRADIUS is currently being used in many systems with 10^6 or more users. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
