MIT looks like a good alternative to Apache License 2.0, that would probably
be my choice #2. Also, please reply in the same thread discussing the
license change ;)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Michael Adams <unquietw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding Marc-Andre's post on switching to the Apache License, I've
> looked at using that myself in the past for projects. Alternatively, I
> would look at the MIT License: that "may" permit some broader GPL usage.
> I've attached references for review...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License
> http://www.opensource.org/proliferation-report
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
> rules translate into the virtual world?
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
> _______________________________________________
> Freerdp-devel mailing list
> Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
rules translate into the virtual world?
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________
Freerdp-devel mailing list
Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
