Jay Sorg wrote, On 05/19/2011 12:08 AM: > Hi Marc, > >> A licensing issue was spotted in ssl.c: the file contains SHA-1 and MD5 >> implementations from Christophe Devine, which would be covered by the GPLv2 >> license. We need to address the issue before releasing FreeRDP 0.9 (the >> version where we officially claim we're all clean license-wise). >> We have two choices: >> 1) We find other implementations in a suitable license >> 2) We implement SHA-1 and MD5 ourselves >> Can anyone recommend certain alternative implementations for SHA-1 or MD5? > There is also RC4. > I can find public domain code for this or write it. > If you want, you can stub the functions out and only leave an empty > function and I can complete it. I hope we don't remove the 'no > crypto' library option, I use it alot.
Is the 'simple crypto' mode really that useful to you when it only supports Server Proprietary Certificate (used for "console" logins), and neither x.509 certificates, TLS nor NLA? Your embedded devices do not have any kind of crypto library that could be used instead of our own? (PolarSSL was an option as a lightweight library, but with FreeRDP moving away from GPL it is no longer that relevant.) /Mads ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
