I am not quite sure how internally those _mm_* functions work, but if those are really functions, it will definitely hurt the performance. I think use assembly SSE2 instruction set directly (like paddw) should be much better.
Vic On 06/10/2011 02:09 PM, S. Erisman wrote: > Yeah, those are similar numbers to what I am getting as well. I even > setup a new ubuntu machine to make sure it wasn't just the test machine > I was using. I'm beginning to think that maybe using SSE isn't the best > way to optimize this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
